The culturally misappropriated Christmas Day is a perfect opportunity for the Queen (the head of the British State and Church of England) and the Archbishop of Canterbury (the permanent secretary of the Church of England, with more political power than the Queen) to say something on the telly. Although most of us ordinary taxpaying plebs were too busy having a blazing family row about what to return to Amazon.co.uk to pay attention to either of them, some people would have watched them in their original broadcast. Most of us would have caught the carefully re-spun headlines sensationalised by the legacy mainstream media.
Where is there a media performance to be re-spun, the legacy mainstream media will be there to re-spin it to meet the legacy mainstream media's own cynical agenda. And, predictably, first past the line is the BBC.
From each media performance, two particular opportunities for some cynical re-spinning were:
"Perhaps part of that wisdom is to recognise some of life's baffling paradoxes, such as the way human beings have a huge propensity for good, and yet a capacity for evil. Even the power of faith, which frequently inspires great generosity and self-sacrifice, can fall victim to tribalism." (Queen)
"God’s language of love is exclusive. It requires us to forget other languages of hatred, tribalism, rivalry, political advantage and of materialism, pride, greed, and so many more." (Archbishop of Canterbury)What each speaker intended is irrelevant. The BBC took both media events, re-spinning each event to serve the BBC's long-preordained position of their beloved anti-Brexit agenda.
The BBC linked Queenie immediately to Brexit, cynically stating, "The monarch, 92, highlighted the importance of people with opposing views treating each other with respect. It comes as Parliament remains divided over the PM's Brexit deal, as the UK prepares to leave the EU in March." No reader/listener needed this spelling out to them, but in view of all other more important difficulties in the world, it is an extraordinarily tribal choice by the BBC editors to link Brexit unnecessarily to the Queen. Thus the BBC indulged in tribalism on the back off a speech that decried tribalism.
The BBC needed a bit of help from a Churchie stooge to link the Bish to Brexit. The most confident unassisted spin of the BBC was the scribble, "While he [the Bish] did not specifically mention the UK's political future, he stressed the importance of the language of love replacing the language of conflict." The BBC needed some helpful soundbitey gibberish techno-babble from another Bish, this one being the Bishop of London, Bishop Mullally. "Debates in politics around the EU referendum have created division," wrote the BBC as a terribly convenient quotation from the Bishop of London. "My belief is that diversity creates strong community; division weakens it."
From the two Bishs' words, the BBC thus promoted two narratives of its ideological agenda. For the first narrative, the BBC allegedly managed to find somebody whose world view is allegedly soooo culturally Marxist that the speaker implied a series of re-bundled artificial distinctions between "diversity", "division" and "difference", loading the terms with unnecessary emotionalism. Unbundle the artificial distinctions and the quotation is just plain nonsense (unless one takes the quotation as an advocacy of "divide-and-rule", a traditional position of the Church). Allegedly. Either the BBC correctly reported Bish Mullally's words, or made them up for her ('ere ya go, luv, read this aaaat"). Allegedly. Howsoever justified, the BBC indulged in tribalism on the back off a speech that decried tribalism, and even "found" another Bish to prop up the tribalism of the BBC's editorial policy.
For the second narrative, the BBC achieved a position of near-perfect cognitive dissonance. Since before 2016, the BBC has always promoted the Remainiac cause, taking every opportunity to denigrate the fight for freedom from technocracy that the vote to leave ultimately represented, being careful to ensure that the denigration was done in the most "impartial" way possible, whilst blocking out any rational voices and non-metropolitan voices within the scope of the issue. Again, the BBC indulged in tribalism on the back off a speech that decried tribalism.
It looks like "taking back control" is going to be a much harder and longer job than any leave voter might have wanted to believe as at 23 June 2016. Taxation without representation continues apace. In the world of the legacy mainstream media, led by the taxpayer-funded BBC, tribalism lives on.
We can be confident that the BBC will continue to present all issues in a tribal, bi-polar way, to meet the BBC's own tribal requirements, for the foreseeable future.